BlockchainCrypto

Hyperliquid’s Yan and CME’s Duffy Split Over Who Must Bear US Compliance

Read full article at source ↗

Based on a feed excerpt; full article content has not been acquired. Source evidence retrieved 24/10/2026, 14:27:24 UTC.

Briefings

Yan and CME's Duffy disagreed on US compliance responsibility, with Yan advocating for market deployer oversight instead of blockchain-level oversight. The interface remains restricted for US users and VPNs, though the specific technical barrier remains unclear. This split occurred in October 2026, with Yan favoring a regulatory approach that targets market participants rather than the platform itself.

Key points

• Yan advocates for market deployer oversight rather than blockchain-level oversight for US compliance.
• Hyperliquid's interface currently bars US-based users and prohibits VPN circumvention.

Context

A regulatory split emerged between Yan and CME's Duffy regarding US compliance responsibility. The specific technical barrier preventing US access remains unclear, though the interface restriction is confirmed.

Limitations

Evidence is limited to the stated disagreement and interface restrictions; specific technical barriers, dates of the split, and the exact nature of the regulatory approach remain unconfirmed.

Generated by Bittrees-hosted qwen35-2b sha256:aaf42c8b7c3c on 24/10/2026, 14:29:44 UTC. Based on publisher-provided feed evidence; may not cover the full original article. Check the source for details.

View archived briefing on IPFS
bafybeifqo2cknh6qnf2fsqoadt2wg2iwuujtqcrmevp5vdxkhnuzpfn2na