AI

Too good to be true? ISTA's GSQ-RCO 2-bit DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scoring the same as the base model

Read full article at source ↗

Based on a feed excerpt; full article content has not been acquired. Source evidence retrieved 25/10/2026, 21:47:26 UTC.

Briefings

A user on r/LocalLLaMA questioned whether ISTA's GSQ-RCO GGUF versions of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash achieve the same quality as the base model, noting benchmarks are saturated. The evidence indicates no KLD or PPL measurements were found for these specific models, leaving the quality comparison unverified.

Key points

• No KLD or PPL measurements were found for ISTA's GSQ-RCO GGUF versions of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.
• Benchmarks for all versions of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash are saturated at 90% or higher.

Context

A user on r/LocalLLaMA asked if ISTA's GSQ-RCO GGUFs for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash match the base model quality, noting benchmarks are saturated and KLD was not found.

Limitations

No KLD or PPL measurements were found for the specific GSQ-RCO GGUF versions, preventing verification of quality degradation or performance metrics.

Generated by Bittrees-hosted qwen35-2b sha256:aaf42c8b7c3c on 25/10/2026, 23:37:41 UTC. Based on publisher-provided feed evidence; may not cover the full original article. Check the source for details.

View archived briefing on IPFS
bafybeiaadzr6jnj5rorbttgwj5qk7v6xfdjwpqpakrbnvdd4442oocpcyy