BlockchainCrypto

Institutional Crypto Custody: A Guide to Roles and Control

Read full article at source ↗

Based on a feed excerpt; full article content has not been acquired. Source evidence retrieved 02/11/2026, 00:27:24 UTC.

Briefings

The provided evidence explains that storing cryptocurrency tokens with a bank does not prevent the bank from pledging those tokens for loans. It emphasizes the necessity of separating safekeeping, signing permissions, and authority to sell collateral. The source directs readers to 'The Defiant' for a full story.

Key points

• Storing tokens with a bank does not rule out pledging them for a loan.
• Separate safekeeping, signing permissions, and authority to sell collateral are required to prevent unauthorized pledging.

Context

This finding clarifies a common misconception in institutional crypto custody, highlighting the need for distinct control mechanisms over assets held by financial institutions.

Limitations

The evidence is a single sentence excerpt from an article. The full context and implications are not available in the provided source, and the specific date of the article is not mentioned.

Generated by Bittrees-hosted qwen35-2b sha256:aaf42c8b7c3c on 02/11/2026, 00:28:08 UTC. Based on publisher-provided feed evidence; may not cover the full original article. Check the source for details.

View archived briefing on IPFS
bafybeiaho2wd37a7bojbn7n2555ozi6twfdwnxzfoums3czgof4m3h34gi