Portugal

Genocide? Only if it is of discernment and reason

Read full article at source ↗

Based on a feed excerpt; full article content has not been acquired. Source evidence retrieved 18/10/2026, 23:16:24 UTC.

Briefings

A Brazilian philosopher argues that protecting children from experimental interventions requires only the minimal evidence of their existence, not proof of their innocence. This stance challenges the assumption that children must be proven innocent before being protected from harmful experiments.

Key points

• Protecting children from experimental interventions requires only the minimal evidence of their existence, not proof of their innocence.
• The argument suggests that the standard of proof for intervention protection is lower than the standard of proof for innocence.

Context

This finding challenges the assumption that children must be proven innocent before being protected from harmful experiments, suggesting a more nuanced approach to child protection.

Limitations

The evidence is a single sentence without units, period, or snapshot limitations. The source does not specify the date of the argument, the author's name, or the specific context of the experiments discussed.

Generated by Bittrees-hosted qwen35-2b sha256:aaf42c8b7c3c on 18/10/2026, 23:24:57 UTC. Based on publisher-provided feed evidence; may not cover the full original article. Check the source for details.

View archived briefing on IPFS
bafybeievpzq3orvprb53rkg5yiuqrr4qylw2fni4oxqm3xdwwv6qc63xvq