Science

Author or just ‘acknowledged’? How women are not gaining full credit for research

Read full article at source ↗

Based on a feed excerpt; full article content has not been acquired. Source evidence retrieved 11/11/2026, 10:20:24 UTC.

Briefings

A 2026 Nature analysis reveals that women are less likely to receive full authorship compared to men, driven by gender and status. The study examines publication patterns across multiple disciplines, showing that while some women achieve full authorship, others are relegated to acknowledgement roles. This finding suggests systemic barriers in academic credit distribution. The research was conducted by researchers at a specific institution, though the exact location is not specified in the evidence.

Key points

• Women are less likely to receive full authorship than men in academic publications.
• The analysis covers multiple disciplines and identifies gender and status as key factors.

Context

This study analyzes authorship distribution patterns to highlight gender disparities in academic credit. It provides insight into why some women receive full authorship while others are limited to acknowledgments, based on a 2026 Nature analysis.

Limitations

The evidence is limited to a single Nature publication from November 2026. Specific institutional locations are not mentioned, and the study does not provide data on all disciplines or time periods covered.

Generated by Bittrees-hosted qwen35-2b sha256:aaf42c8b7c3c on 11/11/2026, 10:48:54 UTC. Based on publisher-provided feed evidence; may not cover the full original article. Check the source for details.

View archived briefing on IPFS
bafybeihihx7chcmgf5zwxj63ykbefdvv37h6j72hpqfmnwihwa3ms6fpoq