Climate
Q&A: Why a pivotal IPCC meeting in Ethiopia ended in ‘profound disappointment’
Publication: Carbon Brief
Author: Carbon Brief Staff
Source published: 20/10/2026, 14:40:10 UTC
Briefing created: 02/11/2026, 01:03:05 UTC
Based on a feed excerpt; full article content has not been acquired. Source evidence retrieved 30/10/2026, 14:50:25 UTC.
Briefings
The IPCC's 65th session in Addis Ababa failed to agree on a timeline for publishing its seventh assessment report (AR7) by the end of 2028, marking the sixth consecutive failure to meet this deadline. Chair Prof Jim Skea suspended the talks, citing a 'profound disappointment' and a 'serious funding crisis' due to disagreements over the budget and report schedules. While some nations want all three working group reports published before the 2028 stocktake, others argue for delayed publication to allow more time for developing countries. The meeting ended with seven timeline options before being reduced to four, leaving the IPCC to reconvene at the earliest opportunity without a decision.
Key points
- The IPCC's 65th session in Addis Ababa failed to agree on a timeline for publishing its seventh assessment report (AR7) by the end of 2028, marking the sixth consecutive failure to meet this deadline.
- A coalition of developed nations and small-island developing states wants all three working group reports published before the 2028 stocktake, while India, Kenya, Russia, and Saudi Arabia argue for delayed publication to allow more time for developing countries.
Context
The IPCC's 65th session in Addis Ababa was the final opportunity for countries to agree on a schedule for the seventh assessment report (AR7) to be published by the end of 2028 for the UN's second global stocktake. The meeting failed to reach consensus on the timeline, leaving the IPCC in a serious funding crisis and suspended talks. The failure undermines global climate action as delays could hinder the preparation of climate science needed for future decisions.
Limitations
Evidence is limited to the provided article excerpt, which covers the timeline debates, key actors, and specific options. Uncertainty remains regarding the final decision on the timeline, the exact budget details, and the specific dates for the reconvened meeting. The article does not provide causal claims or opinions beyond reporting from the Earth Negotiations Bulletin.
Generated by Bittrees-hosted qwen35-2b sha256:aaf42c8b7c3c on 02/11/2026, 01:03:05 UTC. Based on publisher-provided feed evidence; may not cover the full original article. Check the source for details.
View archived briefing on IPFS
bafybeifkaax57wiq6irodfcr3ibjg4p56ivd7kmpy7bkycvhtglz6hrcou