AI

Why don’t we have national open AI models?

Read full article at source ↗

Based on a feed excerpt; full article content has not been acquired. Source evidence retrieved 14/11/2026, 21:47:25 UTC.

Briefings

A US citizen argues that the US government should train national open AI models instead of relying on Deepseek, citing Deepseek's $6 million spending and full publication of its work. The argument claims this approach solves security concerns and prevents monopolistic token pricing, though the source does not specify the US government's official stance or provide specific data on current token pricing.

Key points

• Deepseek spent approximately $6 million on its operations and published all its work.
• A US citizen suggests the US government should train national open AI models to address security and pricing concerns.

Context

The source discusses a debate where a US citizen advocates for national open AI models over using Deepseek, highlighting Deepseek's significant financial investment and transparency as potential benefits.

Limitations

The source does not specify the US government's official stance, nor does it provide specific data on current token pricing or security metrics.

Generated by Bittrees-hosted qwen35-2b sha256:aaf42c8b7c3c on 14/11/2026, 21:58:29 UTC. Based on publisher-provided feed evidence; may not cover the full original article. Check the source for details.

View archived briefing on IPFS
bafybeigndjc5w5b24yovubcocvuv6yhd2s2jylagwpidpa5nayiovlqch4